On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:03:55PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: >>There is a problem. Someone changed the top level configure a while >>ago and broke things. > >That would be me, so I guess I better explain ;-) Actually, I don't think it was you, DJ. I remember the discussion to use any output at all from a compilation as indication of an error. I think that is what changed, wasn't it? I thought that Alexandre Oliva made this change. I know that you were trying valiantly to *fix* it, though. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.1.5s/2000... Jonathan Kamens
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.1.5s... Chris Faylor
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.... Chris Faylor
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.1.5s... Jonathan Kamens
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs DJ Delorie
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs DJ Delorie
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs DJ Delorie
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.1.5s... Earnie Boyd
- RE: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.... Andrej Borsenkow
- RE: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.1.5s... Earnie Boyd
- RE: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.... Andrej Borsenkow
