> Assuming what? That the bin directory isn't relative to the user selected root
> mount path? Or that the mounted bin directory is actually not contained within
> the d:\foo (where d:\foo is the user chosen root mount path) directory but is
> mounted somewhere else? The way setup operates today, you're screwed if you
> move the bin directory anyway and try to update. So, maybe if this is an
> update the translation should happen anyway. But, ...
Yes, this is what I was talking about.
If you want to add code that retains existing mount points *if* they
reflect the "usual" locations of those directories (i.e. they exist
just to set flags), it's OK with me. That should be simpler than full
support for arbitrary mount tables.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
