> If anyone who has
> submitted changes that are not mentioned below wants to chime in, please
> feel free. Also, apologies if I didn't attribute your change to you.
I do! ;)
I posted this few day ago (related to warnings in sys/types.h using FD_ZERO;
I agree with the new size_t definition of i but not to the name 'i' itself.
in the following code:
void
foo()
{
int i;
FD_ZERO( &myfds );
}
gcc warns using: gcc -Wshadow
I hate warnings but I add more and more options in my code to try to get new
one.
I think that ISO/IEC 9899 reserve all symbols starting with '_' (i.e. _i is
not allowed for user -> me).
the FD_ZERO definition shoud be with _i or __i (like __tmp in the
definition) but not with i.
# define FD_ZERO(p) (__extension__ (void)({ \
size_t __i; \
char *__tmp = (char *)p; \
for (__i = 0; __ii < sizeof (*(p)); ++__i) \
*__tmp++ = 0; \
}))
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
