Re: CVS permissions problem with network drive

[Charles S. Wilson]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> Actually, shouldn't this be a mount option rather than a cygwin setting?
> In fact, maybe a
> 
> mount -n c:\foo /foo    # use NTSEC semantics
> 
> would be sort of nice.

Yes, it would.  But, how would 

cp foo //bar/baz

be hamdled?  Besides, this is something you'd configure one way or the
other for all SMB shares -- either you're a domain user or you're not. 
So, it probably shouldn't be set on a per-share or per-mount basis, but
rather it should be set globally for a particular user/installation.  

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple