Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 05:26:26PM -0500, Noel L Yap wrote:
> > When replying to an email list, the replyer cannot assume that the replyee is on
> > the email list (and therefore will get duplicates). Neither can list members
> > remeber who is on the list and who is not. Getting duplicates when on an email
> > list is a fact of life, deal with it yourself; don't ask others to deal with it
> > for you.
>
> While I don't like the way Tom used to say this I think we all would
> have an advantage if everyone would care a little bit for his/her
> mail recipients. The default case should be to send a reply only to
> the list except when one explicitly says "I'm not on the list".
>
Well, Chris could modify the server rules to do that. But, I don't think it wise.
I'm on several lists and those that don't put Reply-to headers for you always send to
all parties regardless. Open lists such as [EMAIL PROTECTED] warrants a Reply-all.
You never know when you might lose a non-member in the thread by someone removing
that address undesireably. They also all suggest that it is the recipient's problem
to deal with the duplicates by filtering.
>
> And btw. I would like to ask again for shortening a reply to it's
> relevant parts instead of sending the whole message of the original
> sender again and again.
>
Yes, especially, it isn't necessary to quote the entire cygcheck output.
>
> Everyone aware of netiquette rule 4?
> http://www.albion.com/netiquette/book/0963702513p39.html
>
Uh, oh, watch out, Ann Landers is on the list ;^).
Cheers,
Earnie.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
