At 01:50 PM 1/15/2001, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> >
> > At 12:43 PM 1/15/2001, Michael Yorg wrote:
> > >I have read that CYGWIN supports running DOS .bat files but the shell seems
> > >the think that they aren't executable. The exact error is, 'command not
> > >found'. I've used chmod to give the file executable status and it still
> > >won't work. Someone recommended running the .bat file from within a shell
> > >script and that didn't seem to work either. What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > Check the mail list archive for discussions on this. You should be able to
> > execute batch files by invoking the command interpreter (i.e. "cmd /c b.bat"
> > on NT/W2K). sh (ash) or bash won't know what to do with these files
> > otherwise, even if it did read them...
> >
>
>Create a noop program named #!.exe and put it in command.com/cmd.exe
>PATH.
>Then at the top of your .bat file put
> #! c:\\path\\to\\cmd.exe /c
>and this will cause Cygwin to think it's executable and execute it.
>
>Cheers,
>Earnie.
Right but these batch files won't run from cmd.exe/command.com like this
though. Still, its a way to "convert" batch files to run under the Cygwin
shells if you don't need them to run under cmd.exe/command.com anymore.
The reason I directed the poster to the email archives is I seem to
remember that there was also some way to get bash/sh to run batch files
directly, without invoking the cmd.exe/command.com explicitly (i.e. one
could just type b.bat at the sh/bash prompt). I don't remember the details
though (which is the part that would be in the email archives for those
interested in looking!;-)) And actually, for me, this works. YMMV and
don't ask me why it works for me!;-)
Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
