"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote: > ... > ... However, > I can say you'll have better luck with a Cygwin version of Emacs, like > XEmacs. You'll find Cygwin applications work much better with other > Cygwin applications, especially in areas of detail like this. How different is XEmacs from GNU/NTEmacs? (I don't do much (any) Lisp programming, so I guess I'm just asking about default configuration and about compatibility of add-ons like JDE.) Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Barclay Digital Focus [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should control-C ... David M. Karr
- Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should contr... Daniel Barclay
- Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should c... David M. Karr
- Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: shou... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: ... David M. Karr
- Re: NTEmacs shell/Cyg... Daniel Barclay
- Re: NTEmacs shell/Cyg... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: shou... Daniel Barclay
- Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should c... Ehud Karni
- Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: shou... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: ... Daniel Barclay
- Re: NTEmacs shell/Cyg... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: NTEmacs shell... Daniel Barclay
- Re: NTEmacs shell... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: NTEmacs shell... Dr. Volker Zell
- RE: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should control-C ... Robinow, David
- Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should control-C ... Mike Bresnahan