> Hmm BTW Anything under the cygwin dist going under LGPL, or how was > it.. is the LGPL already ancient, replaced with something else? The LGPL is only advised for those cases where an equivalent non-free link-compatible solution exists, and the free solution needs something else besides "it's better" to convince people to use it. Its use is discouraged by the FSF. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Cygwin compiled DLL under Visual C++ Hans Holberg
- RE: Cygwin compiled DLL under Visual C++ Kevin Wright
- RE: Cygwin compiled DLL under Visual C++ Schaible, Joerg
- Re: Cygwin compiled DLL under Visual C++ Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin compiled DLL under Visual C++ Andrew Markebo
- Re: Cygwin compiled DLL under Visual C... DJ Delorie
- Re: Cygwin compiled DLL under Visual C... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin compiled DLL under Visual C++ Eric M. Monsler
- Re: Cygwin compiled DLL under Visual C... DJ Delorie
- RE: Cygwin compiled DLL under Visual C++ Schaible, Joerg
