Jesper Eskilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why is it ok to seek to 0 bytes and 1 byte, but not 2?
The test-program passed parameters in the wrong order, the correct order is
lseek(fd, pos, whence)
However, this was not the error I was really trying to fix (the real
program passed the parameters in the correct order). The real problem was
that lseek() fails when doing SEEK_END on a raw device. On Linux and
Solaris, lseek() return 0 when doing SEEK_END on raw devices.
Any comments?
/Jesper
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virtutech http://www.virtutech.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple