Jesper Eskilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Why is it ok to seek to 0 bytes and 1 byte, but not 2?

The test-program passed parameters in the wrong order, the correct order is

        lseek(fd, pos, whence)

However, this was not the error I was really trying to fix (the real
program passed the parameters in the correct order). The real problem was
that lseek() fails when doing SEEK_END on a raw device. On Linux and
Solaris, lseek() return 0 when doing SEEK_END on raw devices.

Any comments?

/Jesper
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesper Eskilson                                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virtutech                                         http://www.virtutech.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply via email to