On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:32:01PM -0500, McCunney, Dennis wrote: > Why not treat the new symlinks like Unix "." files: the .lnk extension is > not shown in a standard directory list, but _will_ be shown by "ls -a", or > if the user provides the explicit file name to ls. That's my point. Not with `ls -a' but explicitely. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- RE: New symlinks. Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: New symlinks. Corinna Vinschen
- Re: New symlinks. Cliff Hones
- Re: New symlinks. Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: New symlinks. Bjoern Kahl AG Resy
- RE: New symlinks. Lothan
- Re: New symlinks. Earnie Boyd
- RE: New symlinks. Lothan
- Re: New symlinks. Christopher Faylor
- RE: New symlinks. McCunney, Dennis
- RE: New symlinks. Corinna Vinschen
- RE: New symlinks. Heribert Dahms
- RE: New symlinks. Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: New symlinks. Corinna Vinschen
- Re: New symlinks. Christopher Faylor
- Re: New symlinks. Robert Collins
- Re: New symlinks. Christopher Faylor
- Re: New symlinks. Robert Collins
- Re: New symlinks. Christopher Faylor
- RE: New symlinks. Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: New symlinks. Christopher Faylor
