Yeah, and what should
find . | xargs ls -ld
find implicitly and write explicitly?
Bye, Heribert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Corinna Vinschen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 10:07
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: New symlinks.
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:32:01PM -0500, McCunney, Dennis wrote:
> > Why not treat the new symlinks like Unix "." files: the .lnk extension
> is
> > not shown in a standard directory list, but _will_ be shown by "ls -a",
> or
> > if the user provides the explicit file name to ls.
>
> That's my point. Not with `ls -a' but explicitely.
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
