Tom Ackerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I started to download the Cygwin utilities, but when I ran several of them I > was so disappointed that each required a separate DLL. To bad, the idea of > having awk, diff, etc. on my NT box sounded nice, but a separate DLL? Bad > idea Umm... I'm not sure what you are talking about. Can you give us an example of a "separate DLL"? If awk, diff, etc. are useful, why do you care how they are implemented? What's wrong with DLLs? <esp> Are you missing cygwin1.dll? </esp> Jon -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
