Ralf Fassel wrote:
>
> * Earnie Boyd
> | In the Cygwin release
> |
> | sh != bash
> | sh == ash
>
> And `ash' is supposed to return 0 for $? of `false'?
>
I wasn't saying ash does or doesn't have a bug; I was pointing your
fallacy especially to the bash-bugs list. If you feel that ash is
incorrect then please, download the source, fix it, submit a patch to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for consideration.
Earnie.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
