Not without a source change AFAIK.
Larry
At 12:20 PM 3/30/2001, Matt Minnis wrote:
>Yes, fred.bat or foo.bat do work now, but so should foo and fred.
>
>Is there a way to enable this behavior?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Matt
>
>At 11:14 AM 3/30/2001, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>>At 11:17 AM 3/30/2001, Matt Minnis wrote:
>>
>>
>> >Is there a way to get Cygwin to recognize that *.bat files are executeable as:
>> >fred.bat & fred (without the .bat)?
>>
>>
>>Anything's possible. foo.bat works for me though.
>>
>>
>>
>>Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
>>118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
>>Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
>
>
>The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.
>=========================================================
>Preferred Resources (314) 567-7600 phone
>701 Emerson rd. (314) 993-6699 fax
>Suite 475 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>St. Louis, MO
>63141
>=========================================================
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple