On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 07:49:15PM -0400, Jan Vicherek wrote: >On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Would it be useful? Since this is the first time that I can recall >>that anyone has asked for this, I think it would be only marginally >>useful. > >Please see my post as of cca 2hrs ago in this same thread. You seem to be asking for accomodations in Cygwin to handler programs that are not built with Cygwin. That really isn't the goal of Cygwin. However, as I said, provide a patch. I'll evalutate it. FWIW, I will *not* accept a patch which "automatically" translates command line arguments. I think that is a remarkably bad idea. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Re: If it is true, Please Help me. Christopher Faylor
- Re: If it is true, Please Help me. Andrew Markebo
- Re: If it is true, Please Help me. Michael A. Chase
- Re: If it is true, Please Help me. Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- OT: the real goal (was Re: If it is tr... Robert Praetorius
- Re: If it is true, Please Help me. Michael A. Chase
- Re: If it is true, Please Help me. Earnie Boyd
- Thanks Re: If it is true, Please Help ... eventualdeath
- Thanks Earnie- Re: If it is true, Plea... eventualdeath
- Re: How to (dynamically) control Unix/Dos P... Jan Vicherek
- Re: How to (dynamically) control Unix/... Christopher Faylor
- Re: How to (dynamically) control Unix/... Jan Vicherek
- Re: How to (dynamically) control Unix/... Christopher Faylor
- Re: How to (dynamically) control Unix/... Christopher Faylor
- Re: How to (dynamically) control Unix/... Robert Collins