Jim Hall wrote: > here is what I did: [applied patch] > This is what I get: [other lovely errors] > Did I do anything wrong? No. Thank you for testing the patch. Now we know that there is more to this problem than merely changing perl.h. It looks like source code changes *to the Win32-API module* will be necessary, but I do not know what those may be. Perhaps Neil Lunn's message in this thread can help? --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Re: Any resolution to win32.h problem? Jim Hall
- Re: Any resolution to win32.h problem? Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: Any resolution to win32.h problem? Christopher Faylor
- Re: Any resolution to win32.h problem? Jim Hall
- Re: Any resolution to win32.h problem? Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Building PERL modules [Was: Re: An... Charles S. Wilson
- Building PERL modules [Was: Re: Any re... Charles S. Wilson
- Re: Building PERL modules [Was: Re... Jim Hall
- Re: Building PERL modules [Was... Charles Wilson
- Re: Building PERL modules ... Jim Hall
- Charles Wilson