At 09:48 AM 5/7/2001, bowman wrote: >From: "Charles S. Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > In fact, somebody else who ALSO refused to > > search in the mailing list archives asked this question less than 12 > > hours ago. > >Perhaps an readily accessible page of known bugs would be more effective >than searching mail archives? I'd estimate my success on searching archives >to be about 50%, with many hits on non-relevant headers, and quite a bit of >searching through threads for the answer, not the question. Contributions in this regard are certainly welcome. Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: 1.3.1: gcc-2.95.3-4 bug with scanf() for floating-point numbers on Win2k
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) Mon, 07 May 2001 07:05:49 -0700
- 1.3.1: gcc-2.95.3-4 bug with scanf() for fl... Ben Stewart
- Re: 1.3.1: gcc-2.95.3-4 bug with scanf... Charles S. Wilson
- Re: 1.3.1: gcc-2.95.3-4 bug with s... bowman
- Re: 1.3.1: gcc-2.95.3-4 bug wi... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: 1.3.1: gcc-2.95.3-4 bug with scanf... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)