Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> I'm very curious as to why you would think that Cygwin *wasn't* supported
> on Windows 2000. Did you find some documentation that indicated this
> somewhere?
>
On the cygwin home page (http://cygwin.com) Windows 95, 98, and NT
are explicitly mentioned, but not Windows 2000.
> Are you possibly a Red Hat customer? We haven't yet fully certified
> Cygwin on Windows 2000 for our support contracts but that's really
> a separate issue since that has nothing to do with the net release.
No, we use Debian.
Regards,
Horst Goeringer
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
