Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 09:25:06PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
> > Hi All...
> >
> > OK...I found it...perl was not getting installed because it is labelled as
> > experimental and setup-2.57 didn't pick it up (without selecting
> > experimental).
> >
> > Is it perl, mutt and automake that are still labelled as experimental? If
> > they are not really, can the labelling please be changed?
>
> I did for mutt and automake. Where is the perl maintainer?
Eric Fifer (new father, which explains his infrequent participation on
the list). In any case, the current perl is based on
"perl-5.6.1-TRIAL1" -- e.g. the cygwin perl is based on what
perl5-porters THEMSELVES consider an experimental release. So, IMO the
test designation should not be removed unless Eric syncs up with
"perl-5.6.1 (official)". (And I think perl-5.6.2 official has been
released, anyway...)
AFAIK, the holdup is that Eric is trying to work out the nasty
text/binary issues that reappeared in 5.6.1-TRIAL1-cygwin.
--Chuck
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
