Ummm, no ;-) Performance is now on pretty even keel with with the Pthread-win32 implementation. This is where our `rogue' developer is claiming to reduce elapsed times 25% to match the elapsed times on linux. Most of the users of our application (by it's nature) are computer professionals and notice (ie whine) about things like this. (See http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules/). So now we are at the point where we can start shaving off seconds ;-) Greg > > I presume this win32-pthread like performance is "good enough" ? > > Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Greg Smith
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Christopher Faylor
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Christopher Faylor
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Robert Collins
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Robert Collins
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Robert Collins
- Re: pthreads works, sorta -... Robert Collins
- Re: pthreads works, sor... Christopher Faylor
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Tak Ota
- RE: pthreads works, sorta Robert Collins
- RE: pthreads works, sorta Greg Smith
- RE: pthreads works, sorta Robert Collins
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Christopher Faylor
- RE: pthreads works, sorta Robert Collins
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Christopher Faylor
- RE: pthreads works, sorta Robert Collins
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Tak Ota
- RE: pthreads works, sorta Robert Collins
- Re: pthreads works, sorta Christopher Faylor
- Re: pthreads works, sorta =?x-unknown?b?tsCn07av?=
- RE: pthreads works, sorta Robert Collins