John,
Chill, dude. Sure, Michael's subject line is less-than-inspiring, but
the message content was thorough, showed that he has researched his
performance problem, and <probably> pinpointed the cause. I'll trade
that for a "nice" subject line+clueless message body ANY day.
If he'd also been able to include a patch to fix the problem, I'd
probably wet my pants. [:-)]
--Chuck
BTW, why'd did you BCC: the cygwin list? Blind copying makes it hard to
keep message threads/replies on-list; requires manual intervention of
prospective reply-ees. (and it's been so long since I actually
*initiated* a thread, I typed the cgywin mailing address in wrong the
first time...)
John Fortin wrote:
> Hmmm, I am assuming that based on the subject your purpose was to
> enflame the passions of people who use cygwin everyday.
> If this was supposed to be a request for information, you style
> leaves a bit to be desired.
> ...Or your manners stopped evolving when you were ten.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
