On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 03:11:42PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: > I appear to have empirical evidence that indicates that PostgreSQL > can tolerate receiving SIGTERM and/or SIGINT during an NT shutdown. ... > Note that this seems to > indicate that a Fast Shutdown can interrupt and supersede a Smart one. > Message [4] indicates that PostgreSQL was able to restart without any > manual intervention. Excellent! Your experimental results trump my hunch, big time. > Should I submit the attached patch (with ChangeLog) to cygwin-patches > for consideration? Yes, please. This patch would seem to provide the last piece needed (along with cygrunsrv) to make PostgreSQL robust as an NT/Win2000 service. And with no changes whatsoever to PostgreSQL code -- bonus! -- Fred Yankowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: +1.630.879.1312 Principal Consultant www.OntoSys.com fax: +1.630.879.1370 OntoSys, Inc 38W242 Deerpath Rd, Batavia, IL 60510, USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
