At 10:31 AM 8/8/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Is Cygwin still inherently insecure on a multiuser system, or is this a FAQ
>entry that hasn't been
>revised in a while? If it's still correct, is there any way to lock it down

Cygwin itself is insecure so anything built on it is inherently insecure,
at the local level.  At this point, there are no implemented options to 
address this issue. 


Larry Hall                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to