----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >I think we should either get a consensus from all the package > >maintainers, or perhaps, wait 3 days for objections. If no objections, > >then the package is allowed in. If there are objections, discuss until > >resolved. To prevent deadlock, a single individual objecting will not > >cause a package to be rejected, the objections must be agreed with by > >other package maintainers. > > As long as I get veto power or whatever the opposite of veto power, > that's fine with me. I'm not exactly Linus in this situation, I guess.
Well in this situation you are a package maintainer - the cygwin package. Just object :]. > I'm not sure that we really need to be this formal, though. Who's going > to be doing the tracking? How many new packages are we going to get? I can easily keep a notepad list of packages that have had someone put their hand up for, and every 3 days delete 1 day off the list. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
