My use of "anonym" was a joke. Sorry if it was too deadpan. But my serious point was that if a pseudonym costs nothing to get or give up, it makes one effectively anonymous, if one so chooses.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:37:28AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > R. A. Hettinga wrote: > > At 12:06 AM +0100 on 7/1/02, Ben Laurie wrote: > >>No, a pseudonym can be linked to stuff (such as reputation, > >>publications, money). An anonym cannot. > > > > More to the point, there is no such "thing" as an "anonym", by definition. > > Hmm. So present the appropriate definition? -- Barney Wolff I never met a computer I didn't like.