At 9:24 AM -0500 on 11/16/02, Stuart Schechter wrote:
> I don't think you'll find our paper to be overly technical - at least not > from a computer science or cryptographic perspective. We wrote this paper > because we believe that determining the level of security necessary to deter > an adversary is a problem of more general interest. Certainly if it's *financially* calculable. ;-). Cheers, RAH Who, for instance, sees nothing at all wrong with selling votes. Where I come from, it's called "equity". :-). -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
