"Israeli hit teams" - Erroneous Analysis. Reference Documents:
http://www.etherzone.com/2003/sans012103.shtml http://kevxml2a.infospace.com/_1_OY9T5W04I69RZH__info/kevxml?kcfg=upi- article&sin=2003011516200305078&otmpl=/upi/story.htm&qcat=news&rn=419&qk=10&pass date=01/15/2003 In Regard to, amongst other topics, Joe Sansone's excessively short-sighted and erroneous analysis: Granted, IC operations may have down sides when engaguing politial motivations, however, the use of Mossad tactical teams in the USA is a VERY high asset to the american and international population and their safety. The US FBI is blatently incapable of performing security tasks, in a large majority of cases, US federal agents have requested and required the assistance of private security teams and corporate resources to isolate and destroy hostile weapons, bombs, and perform required interception of terrorist actions. The US Federal Government is INCAPABLE of responding to real-time threats, especially those of highly skilled terrorist operations. The use of military special forces and CIA resources is forbidden by law on US soil. No party aside from a limited few private and corporate tactical teams are capable of responding in a manner required in these situations. The only parties capable of advanced IC operation and response within the US and numerous other countries are operatives of international origin. Most of the other countries attempting to deal with terrorist activity are also prevented from taking effecient action against hostile threats with similar logistics, and MOST enlist and contract CIA or US IC operatives who are within their country to engague the issues. In this case, the public acknowledgement that a 3rd party is attempting to stabilize and secure the US territories is and should be highly supported. No US GOVT operation is capable of responding to a realtime terrorist threat. Corporate and Private sector operations are limited in their heavy weapons capabilities, and typically have issues working with US-federal entities due to extreme security concerns. The only party capable of intercepting that weapon that is trying to kill you, the simple american, are international IC operatives. As long as they are not engagued in hostile targeting of parties who can be dealt with in more appropriate manners (containment), such tactical response teams are HIGHLY supportive of american safety. It is unfortionate that all media response thus far to this issue has brought more attention to the undesirable factors of having non-local IC operatives present, however, they also fail to recognise the ability of these teams to do things impossible for US agents due to current restrictions. These operatives, in most cases, and their logistic infrastructure, already exist in all countries. Why not allow them to do their job? I disagree with the assination of a researcher and scientific developer as referenced, however, these operatives are ALSO capable, and most are more inclined to do so, in preventive operations which eliminate extreme threats before people are killed. Just think what would have happened to a large number of american cities and infrastructure if the international IC and covert operations specialists and corporate security teams had REFUSED to compensate for the American Federal Government's incapacity to respond to realtime threats? You might not be alive right now. Think before you write or accept severely erroneous articles. -Wilfred L. Guerin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
