On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 07:36 PM, Andri Esteves wrote:
There's absolutely nothing wrong with reading popularizers.On Thursday, 13 de February de 2003 02:02, you wrote:You still read science popularizers ?On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 05:04 PM, Andri Esteves wrote:Everything that could go wrong in academia and science is in Portugal.I sat in a bookstore and read most of his book several weeks ago. A few
That is the background Magueijo comes from...
comments:
First, I kept looking for a clear description of the theory, with
convincing details, support, etc. I didn't find it. I instead found a
lot of stuff about peeing outside a bar in some tropical place, stories
about his girlfriend, insults he delivered to editors at "Nature," and
on and on. Sort of a "Fear and Loathing on the Road to Quantum
Gravity." (Pun with Smolin's title intended.)
If you like science you should go to the source. I can't read many tecnhical
articles, but good sinopses and conclusions give you an idea of the article's
inplications. Just have to build a field mind map of an area...
Unlike you, I see great value in reading overviews by folks like Brian Greene, Lee Smolin, and John Barrow before digging in to the arXives at xxx.lanl.gov.
He's one of Magueijo's collaborators on VSL, so if you have not heard of him you should not be commenting at all.Second, I don't know about Hawking's books, but Lee Smolin is one ofNever heard of him... Books are very expensive in Portugal...
the current popularizers who have done excellent jobs. I recommend both
of his books. His own "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" is crystal clear
in describing several of the competing theories. Smolin also explains
what's really important. (Check the archives for my past comments on
Smolin and topos theory, for example, from last summer.)
As the publishing houses in portugal mainly publish religious or black-magic
themes... I will probably read it in english...
This is a silly comment. There are experimental results in many areas of physics, including at the frontiers.At least there is some experimental work on it. Wich tons of theorical workThird, I have no idea if the VSL theory is "right." Time will tell.
in physics don't even try to achieve and with blessing of the establishment...
What can i say... Career or science. Are you part of the problem or of the
solution??
...
Venal comments.
--Tim May "As my father told me long ago, the objective is not to convince someone with your arguments but to provide the arguments with which he later convinces himself." -- David Friedman