Couple ideas. I am interested in peer reviews. :)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 01:43:11 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [gulfwar-2] Al-Jazeera Calls... - strategy proposal
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Truckle the Uncivil wrote:
> It is too well co-ordinated to be that. Any new route seems to take less
> than five minutes to be blocked.  it is well organised.

It doesn't matter, at least not now, who is behind it. It matters what is
happening and what can be done about it.

If someone manages to convince al-Jazeera editors to publish not only by
upload to some server(s) but also by eg. emailing the updated files to
several helpers who then either set up mirrors or put them to P2P networks
(Freenet <http://freenet.sourceforge.net/> is especially suitable for this
purpose, because of its inherent load-balancing capabilities).

The limitation of Freenet is a relatively small number of users and
relatively difficult availability. The advantage is the difficulty of
taking it down or tracing the data source, and its load-balancing.

The limitation of P2P networks is the easiness of taking down the
individual nodes in the early phases of content distribution, when there
are only few of them. Their advantage is in their easy availability and
the raw numbers of users.

My proposed solution is a two-tiered distribution network; al-Jazeera
editors can upload the content to Freenet, from where the seed nodes take
it and publish on the "classic" Gnutella/Kazaa/WinMX... networks. The
source nodes (the editors) are hidden behind the secured network, the P2P
seed nodes are protected by their amount. The infrastructure for both
tiers is already existing.

If the adversary is just a bunch of script kids with IRC bots, they will
not have any chance to defeat this. If the adversary is the Government,
they still aren't too likely to strike many winning points. If nothing
other, it can be a field test of a rapid-deployment community-based
anticensorship effort.

Are there any weaknesses in this scheme?

    Shaddack, the Mad Scientist

Reply via email to