"Basically they say things like "If you think the government can't break all
the encryption schemes that we have, you're nuts." This guy was a math major
too, so he understands the principles of crypto."


Basically, the answer was hinted at by another poster.

For anyone who doesn't trust the government, the point to make is that crypto use is currently a red flag. Last year I went through great pains on this list to point out that right now the gubmint probably doesn't even need to break most encrypted messages in order to know something's up. This is only possible because outside of a coporate context few individuals use encryption.

If everybody uses encryption, then it matters MUCH less if the government can break any one message. What costs us pennies to encrypt may cost them thousands to break. That's the assymmetry we asyms can exploit. That's where we need to depart from a Tim May lone wolf approach to your friendly, smiling America-loving flag-waving cypherpunks: "If you don't use encryption then you help the terrorists win".

This statement has the added irony of being objectively true, according to more international definitions of 'terrorism'.

-TD




From: Burning Cows with Strauss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>(by way of Burning Cows with Strauss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: "If you use encryption, you help the terrorists win"
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 20:37:47 -0600


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 25 October 2003 04:27 pm, Tyler Durden wrote:
> Tim May wrote...
>
> secure (every ask anyone if they believed there was such a thing as
> effectively 'unbreakable' encryption? Reglar folks always believe
> SOMEBODY'S got the technology to break what scheme you use, so "why
> bother").

I have a few friends like this....anyone have suggestions for ways to change
their minds?


Basically they say things like "If you think the government can't break all
the encryption schemes that we have, you're nuts." This guy was a math major
too, so he understands the principles of crypto.


I feel pretty confident that 2048 bit encryption is reasonably safe for now,
but how can I convince others, and how safe should I really feel in that
opinion anyway?


Steve

- --
Steve Wollkind                                  810 C San Pedro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                       College Station, TX 77845
http://njord.org/~steve                         979.575.2948
- --
All these worlds are belong to us, except Europa.  Take off no zigs there.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/mwqO0uexoyuzySARApnNAKCUxOrLDh2gk1Ls5piL1zsnXzhHuwCfUW5l
AYtOw2wfT0EqlvhWxo5rup4=
=12ec
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_________________________________________________________________
Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account has exceeded its 2MB storage limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es




Reply via email to