Re: Flying with Libertarian Hawks

[Tyler Durden]

Damn right. 'Conservative' means agreeing with the most vocal proponents of 
the current right wing apparatchiks. It seems to have little or no 
relationship to fiscally conservative ideas. "Left wing" now refers to 
anyone who disagrees with the 'Conservatives', even if said left wing 
policies are practically identical to those of the 'right'.

-TD


From: "Major Variola (ret)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Flying with Libertarian Hawks
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 05:53:06 -0700
At 07:53 AM 9/10/04 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
><http://www.techcentralstation.com/090904A.html>
>
>Is it possible for one to be libertarian about policies at home and
>neo-conservative about policies abroad? After all, isn't the principle
of
>non-coercion incompatible with the interventionist policies of the
current
>Administration? Simply put: is there such an animal as a libertarian
hawk
>and if he exists, why do we so seldom hear from him?
On the contrary, the Ayn Rand institute has been taken over by
vocal Zionists.  They would never bomb Dimona but if a non-israeli
semite even thinks about uranium, its missiles away.
Or if the South Koreans do a bit of clandestine enrichment, no big deal,
they're "our" *friends*.
-----
"Stop shedding our blood to save your own and the solution to this
simple
 but complex equation is in your hands. You know matters will escalate
the more you
delay and then do not blame us but blame yourselves. Rational people do
not risk their
security, money and sons to appease the White House liar." UBL
The only language the American people understand is
dead Americans. -EC
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! 
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/