At 01:19 PM 12/10/04 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote: >I disagree. Except for the early days, spammers have been little more >than a low volume nuisance on Mix. What killed mix was it's complexity - >Joe Blow can't figure out how to use it, and new reops have a hell of a
>time getting a node running (with pingers and other required tools). > >Take away complexity, and Mix *could* flourish - in spite of the fedz. I agree, with the additional constraint that mix functionality piggyback with a more popular feature. Most folks won't install even the most benign, easy to use mixer; but include a mix server in a jazzy IM or next-gen napster program, and you get deployed.