On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:45:58PM -0500, Steve Thompson wrote: > Well we all know that having complete control over one's own > computer is far too dangerous. Obviously, it would be best if > computers, operating systems, and application software had > proprietary back-doors that would enable the secret police to > arbitrarily monitor the all goes on in the suspicious and dark > recesses of memory and the CPU.
If there's nasty Nagscab living on your motherboard, you might as well use it for something constructive: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6633 (Of course the stuff might contain undocumented "features", so only a fool would rely it to conform to specs, all the time). -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net
pgpGWG1YRbs5v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
