I believe you substantially misunderstood my statements, 2^69 work is doable _now_. 2^55 work was performed in 72 hours in 1998, scaling forward the 7 years to the present (and hence through known data) leads to a situation where the 2^69 work is achievable today in a reasonable timeframe (3 days), assuming reasonable quantities of available money ($500,000US). There is no guessing about what the future holds for this, the 2^69 work is NOW.I wasn't aware that FPGA technology had improved that much if any - feel free to correct my misapprehension in that area though :)
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
- Re: SHA1 broken? James A. Donald
- Re: SHA1 broken? Joseph Ashwood
- Re: SHA1 broken? Dave Howe
- Re: SHA1 broken? Roland Dowdeswell
- Re: SHA1 broken? Joseph Ashwood
- Re: SHA1 broken? Dave Howe
- Re: SHA1 broken? Eugen Leitl
- Re: SHA1 broken? Dave Howe
- Re: SHA1 broken? Joseph Ashwood
- Re: SHA1 broken? R.A. Hettinga
- RE: SHA1 broken? Trei, Peter
- Re: SHA1 broken? Major Variola (ret)
- Re: SHA1 broken? Tyler Durden
- Re: SHA1 broken? Thomas Shaddack
- Re: SHA1 broken? Riad S. Wahby
- Re: SHA1 broken? Tyler Durden