At 9:16 PM -0400 10/28/2000, John Kelsey wrote: > >I'll comment more on this from another note of yours. I >think you're probably right, but that we need to figure out >how to really nail that argument down, which means >specifying exactly what's meant by ``close to an inverse,'' >or whatever. I have some ideas on this, based on the earlier note, but I think I should take some time and write them up more formally. Arnold Reinhold
- Re: Paranoid Encryption Standard (was Re: Rijndael &... Bram Cohen
- Re: Paranoid Encryption Standard (was Re: Rijndael... John Kelsey
- Re: Paranoid Encryption Standard (was Re: Rijndael... Damien Miller
- Re: Paranoid Encryption Standard (was Re: Rijn... Arnold G. Reinhold
- RE: Paranoid Encryption Standard (was Re: Rijndael... Carskadden, Rush
- Arnold G. Reinhold