> Hi! > > Thanks for the kind words and constructional thoughts. sure, anytime
> > I guess you are trying to say that there are some EU countries where KYC > would not be needed? More to the point, you shouldn't be efforting to comply with any such shit law. You should be migrating off your web-based platform and doing what others are pursuing - decentralized systems. General Conceptual Examples ~ bitcoin/bitcoin, OpenBazaar, Mastercoin's decentralized exchange, recently launched. > If that is the case you could be correct I can't > really say. Never the less is there no payment system that does not > operate on a EU wide set of rules. Well there is the USA. And China. But then you have TISA, are you going to comply with that too? > If you have any other information > please share it instead of just being rude. We would love to not need to > do the KYC if it where possible. But we can not risk going to jail for it. > It's enough that one of us is there already :( Fail > > On bitcoins or crypto currency are that a niche market that is so small > that moving over to something like that would topple Flattr over night. > Proved by the minuscule usage when we supported it. Maybe they will be > more widely adopted in 3-5 years and that we could do something with them > then. If we still are around. And yes the people that created the bitcoin > processor we used, BIPS probably where rather incompetent. Never the less > did we get the stats we needed to decide it was not for us. Fail > > Linus, from his phone. > >> On 7 jul 2014, at 08:27, coderman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Odinn Cyberguerrilla >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> ... there are alternatives for the users so (use of some >>> decentralized virtual currency options) wouldn't necessitate what you >>> are >>> proposing even in countries where you might be faced with it. Flattr >>> is >>> wrong. Flattr is fail. >> >> >> sounds like they are also incompetent: >> """ >> 4. Flattr has abandoned Bitcoin funding because of “technical issues”. >> Can you be more specific? What was the exact problem? Was Bitcoin used >> at all ? >> >> The payment provider had a window of payment of 15 minutes, too many >> transactions did not arrive during this time and gave us way to many >> technical issues and admin overhead. Not to say unhappy customers. >> Bitcoin was used, but it was just a few % of the money added to the >> system each month. Meaning the problems it caused could not be >> justified economically. >> """ >
