Dnia poniedziałek, 7 lipca 2014 16:06:47 Dāvis Mosāns pisze: > I don't agree, I think XMPP could be good solution, while yes attack > surface is quite large but it will be in any case, because even if you > create the very minimalist chat protocol possible (let's say basically use > asymmetric cryptography for messages which are plaintext without any > features) you still can have bugs in cryptography library, network stack, > OS/kernel. This part will be same no matter what messaging protocol you > use.
Exactly. And that's an argument for NOT minimizing the attack surface beyond these problems... how exactly? I mean, your argument is basically: "don't wash your hands, as there might be salmonella in the eggs anyway". Dafuq? -- Pozdr rysiek
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
