On 7/25/15, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > Thanks. The link appears to contradict wired's claim of "wireless > exploit",
incorrect. it was wireless, and not only that, it was remote incoming over Sprint infrastructure. > possibly because they are covering their corporate asses. so much ass covering right now! > Fiat Chrysler said exploiting the flaw "required unique and extensive > technical knowledge, ahahahah > prolonged physical access to a subject vehicle and lololololol > extended periods of time to write code" and added manipulating its > software "constitutes criminal action". motherfuckers, did you learn nothing? this is how not to respond to severe, critical, architectural defects in critical systems. guess auto industry gonna play it ugly. (too bad, we all lose!) best regards,
