-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 So is anyone working on building an 'openfab' or is it such a big task that everyone just backs away in horror? :D
On 28 July 2015 22:04:38 BST, grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: >> TrueCrypt has been audited[0] and come through relatively unscathed; >> I'd trust it over a Microsoft product I'd need to disassemble to >> examine any day. > >You may trust your opensource code but would still need to >disassemble and audit any critical and closed windows libs and >system interfaces you compile against, let alone run in / under. >This is the trouble with closed platforms. You have some luck >with open unix, but the luck buck currently stops at the iron and >the hardware is getting worse. And we don't have any open fabs on >the horizon to solve it. This is BAD. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.1.1 iQI7BAEBCgAlBQJVuAT2Hhxvc2h3bSA8b3Nod21Ab3Blbm1haWxib3gub3JnPgAK CRAqeAcYSpG1iCCOD/0YW09ajR9GYClZ4eD4bbwxvjBbe7AfhBDurbFYiMm07dM5 wRtbjeheWOLFjBWHVGWFaA7TnUN+z2qAvPqzvJzRXu78tBOXtNtgXh7Ey541Z836 mONsRDeuD7EHOxy4RN/bNsqIanWGUjgAfpuaP7hcgMNF5R2ihcWli2Fl7kdfgv1H 6mFqoMB20NDUetIRqJlr4T8yyRJk3GuRi1netkHL1AW/VAvXECD3HCz3Hj2hAwXK lKqA2XHFYoZkhdD6/vWTqe8wtiUNd5ICjU5RxqVLbqpQzlnliKARKQpPcKCqTiFZ BMcPSQHsNKyulGEgZsphXg33edvBoUcud5+a+mE4Cn2UleHbgm3bp/X0P6vBcXv9 A46PlHAEuO+DJaGX3Ophg4yCmC6d97tN2xOQv1lfuJGF5hytPJpDcQQbZDwg0Lxw T69cl16rQe0lZO/6lXxkOLRo8iex6DEtP98fEEdbvmJyC49SKWEZVGq9663J+ZwI Qmry6ob1JbKnz9MwlroOm6jGdQZ08sM+1wQzA6hONo0MGhi8ZbKSKjIhumr5TQVy gHp1FFojxVUctsfTGneHNo8tvk2WJRzezNiH/cLJ41A6yYPVVOyASlxT2tkn9DlO h0NIDD4UH9juHLDOvdNK4BNKWdDV7khP6bGYx/NwV2RVHys8HhpX+NPq+QeZbw== =3fLH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
