On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:06:33 -0600
Troy Benjegerdes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Well, American exporters would be quite happy if the flight from
> the petro-dollar devalued the currency a bit. We could maybe sell
> some stuff then.
Are you saying that subsidizing american firms by robbing
people who hold dollars is good? Well, of course it's good for
the thieving assholes who get the subsidy...
>
> The banksters are probably starting to figure out that student-loan
> debt-servitude is going to end quite badly unless we have a little
> real-world goods and wage inflation while the suckers who bought
> bonds are getting less than 1%.
Wage inflation? So you want people who work for a wage to earn
less? And stuff to be more expensive?
>
> The rest of the world is paying the fed to hold their money,
What?
> and
> thankfully we've now got Bitcoin to keep anti-inflation quacks
So what are you? You sound like a pro inflation quack. Well
quack is not best word. Though of course inflationists are
poster children for economic bullshit, and their 'theories' are
laughable nonsense. But calling them "quacks" kinda misses the
point...
> occupied with something shinier and easier to track than gold.
>
> Besides, what's the point of trading in oil when we have mountains
> of corn to make into ethanol and a battery megafactory getting built
> to run a bunch of luxury self-driving cars?
