On 6/9/16, Dan White <dwh...@olp.net> wrote: > https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2971.txt
Its an optional extension, and a privacy violating one, with a long list of MUST NOTs, in deference to actual CAPABILITYs, thus ignored this pointless rfc from list of standard rfc's. I'll submit my own bugs and pass on stats.
