In what sense was it rhetorical? Do you think he wasn't wondering what or whom to believe amidst conflicting stories? It's not a simple question when the media bombards you with it.
And, sorry, Hegel is likely the only answer as it incorporates the scientific method as well as EVERY OTHER. Was there another? \0x On 7/17/16, Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tan...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 17, 2016 4:28 PM, "Xer0Dynamite" <dreamingforw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Who to believe? Try getting out and traveling. You can experience > reality without believing anything. Then you can formulate differing > opinions into new synthesis of understanding. >> >> Understand that concept from Hegel, it can enlighten you. > > Mark, > > Georgi was making a rethorical question only. And, sorry, in my opinion, > Hegel is not the best answer. I tried it when I was a pretentious > teenager. Now, I am just pretentious, hihi... ;) > > (But not so much as Zenaan, ugh!) > > Take care! > > - c. >
