On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:43:12 +0300 Georgi Guninski <gunin...@guninski.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:13:45AM -0300, juan wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:45:57 +0300 > > Georgi Guninski <gunin...@guninski.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:42:40AM -0300, juan wrote: > > > > https://blog.torproject.org/blogs/ssteele > > > > > > > > "two additional people...are no longer involved with the Tor > > > > Project." > > > > > > > This is how free market work :PPPP > > > > > > Military contractors have nothing to do with the free > > market. > > > > Are you sure about this? AFAICT you called them "security insurance" > in the free market. I'm talking about the current kind of military contractors, which includes the tor project. And what I said about insurance is that activities that currently are carried by the state/police can be replaced by insurace. As a matter of fact, even today the police doesn't do anything useful if you get robbed whereas if your stuff is insured you will get your money back. I don't think any kind of army belongs in a free society/free market so, no, no military contractors in a free market. Aaaaand, all this has nothing to do with the 'anonymous' firing done by the tor project anyway. > > Anyway, I meant that in a free market (FM), you will still have > corporations (possibly under more politically correct term like FM > corporation). 'corporations' are a legal fiction created by the state, so no. > The boss of a FM corporation can fire whoever for whatever reasons > (especially for critique of the FM corp and god forbid for disbelief > of the current implementation of the FM). > > > > > > > > This reminds me how Mozilla screwed Brendan Eich (the creator of > > > javascript) for a legal donation not related with his work. > > > > > > > > > people without even naming them? I wouldn't like to imagine that > > > > they have 'secret' 'nameless' employees? > > > > > > > > > > Not exactly employees, but the bosses of their official bosses > > > are not public IMHO (maybe few more levels of recursion are > > > needed). > > > > > > Ah, if you mean the pentagon pyschos whose cocks syverson > > suck, right, those are 'anonymous'. > > > > But the guys who just got fired are at the bottom of the > > hiearchy/mafia. > > OK, I wasn't clear enough (didn't bother to type for this trolling). > > I meant the bosses of the grayhat Obomba (soon to be replaced by > something visually whiter).
