On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:52:40 -0700 Rayzer <ray...@riseup.net> wrote: > On 08/02/2016 09:16 PM, juan wrote: > > > > > Tor works exactly as designed. It is a 'honeypot'. > > Prove intent if you're going to make that claim.
I don't need to prove the intent of the US militaty. Even reading a couple of newspapers would 'prove' it. Onyl a worthless scumbag like you would doubt the intent of the US military *and their contractors*. > > (Crickets chirping...) Are you hearing stuff inside your head? Well, considering that you can't even read your name, that's not surprising. > > It's a FLAG YOU WAVE that lets them 'kettle' you into a honeypot if > your security is lax. > > Which is why I say we need millions of "flag wavers" to assist in the > obscuring process. > > No matter the technology. No matter the code. If you are the only > person using it and the government, for whatever reason doesn't want > you to, you're a dead duck eventually. > > Rr > > > > On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 04:00:12 +0000 (UTC) > > jim bell <jdb10...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> Perhaps the > >> solution will be that the Tor project team will study how to insert > >> "anti-bad-people"chaff into the Tor streams, increase the number of > >> hops > > The number of hops is irrelevant because the tor network > > fails 'at the edges'. It doesn't matter how many times you bounce > > stuff inside the network since the traffic is 'correlated' > > when it enters/leaves the network. > > > > > >> (more to confuse the "bad people"; they confuse the hell out of > >> me!), etc. Eventually, they will have to sadly announce that they > >> haven't yet fully succeeded in preventing"bad people" from using > >> Tor, but they HAVE greatly improved security in various ways. > > > > What makes you think that military contractors for the US > > military(i.e. tor) have any interest in improving the > > security of the enemies of the US gov't/military? > > > > Tor works exactly as designed. It is a 'honeypot'. > > > > > > > > > > Jim Bell > >> > > > > > >