On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:13:36 -0400 grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/10/16, juan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:02:36 -0600 > > Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> It does look more and more like an SJW lynching, doesn't it? > > > > That was pretty much self-evident, from the start. > > Similar to assassins, warriors are hardly ever some completely > independant self actors... True. The ruling faction of the tor mafia, a US military contractor, settled some score with one of their 'ex' employees/accomplices. And they did that by means of a feminist anti-sex lynching, which of course suits the military/american 'culture' of the tor corporation. I didn't mean it was an 'ordinary' SWJ lynching only motivated by 'social' 'justice'. If that's what Mirimir thinks then I don't agree with him. > most are owned by their masters, > assembled into bands and armies, tasked with orders, and > compensated well, some possibly approaching doing it free for > the mere subby joys of ass kissing... > > >> Being a sexually aggressive male seems dangerous in geek community. > > > > Nope. It is dangerous in government circles. Especially > > americunt government circles. > > ... as such, to limit the possible reasons... to a relatively > sizeable group of people getting in a bit too deep with their sex > games, twittermania, and jealousy trips (a possibility some have > mentioned as self-evident)... seems a bit narrow and foolish... True that. > > >> to fuck everyone, and you have protected status ;) > > ... so look for the evidence of larger answers, protect ya > neck while doing so, and duck and cover if you're holding some, > because these days, the fuckbullets seem to be flying and even > protected status of asylum hardly feels as safe as freedom...
