On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:22:09PM +0000, Sean Lynch wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:07 PM juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 22:34:32 +0000 > > Sean Lynch <se...@literati.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Now there's one I hadn't heard before. Usually you hear about the > > > "NWO" from people pushing UFO theories and new age bullshit, or from > > > Christian conspiracy theorists who think Obama is the antichrist > > > trying to create the NWO or some such crap. > > > > So, you want to associate serious political analysis with that > > kind of lunatics because you have zero argumentes against > > serious politcal analysis. > > > > I think I may not have been clear. I was referring to the crap on the " > redefininggod.com" web site more than Zenaan's reply.
"More than" my reply, or "not" my reply - how far do you intend to take your retraction, just to be clear, ? > And like it or not, the concept of the "New World Order" is > inextricably linked with conspiracy theories, To what extent do you distinguish conspiracy theory from conspiracy fact? Seriously, can you speak with clarity on this? If you can, please do so, I'd like to hear what you have to say - "conspiracy theory vs conspiracy fact" > so it's probably best to avoid using the phrase if you want to be > taken seriously. Speak to conspiracy theory vs conspiracy fact, and we might be able to have a conversation.
