On 08/30/2016 11:53 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 08/31/2016 12:29 AM, grarpamp wrote: >> On 8/30/16, Ray Dillinger <b...@sonic.net> wrote: >>> considered the possibility that it's just somebody with a homemade >>> transmitter who's trolling them for giggles? >> >> If it fuzzes up their system with more crap, who cares. >> Crypto everywhere. >> >>> I could pick up an amateur radio tomorrow and read the output >>> of a CPRNG out loud into a microphone. >>> Would I wind up talking to the guys with >>> the expensive sunglasses and cheap shoes again? >> >> If you were stupid enough to do it in your voice >> which they'd match up to all your voice they have >> in Utah, instead of using text2speech, then yes. >> >>> Would that cause an international incident? >> >> Sounds fun, try it and find out. > > Are there still Russian women reading eight-character strings on random > frequencies? > > https://io9.gizmodo.com/a-great-way-to-listen-to-those-mysterious-number-stati-1605472855 >
The ones I heard SWLing in the 90s were mostly Spanish speakers but the gray line plays into that in California where even a stock sideband cb radio and 2 el quad can work n-s almost any day of the year. There's audio around where you hear readers' fuckups, people coming into the room and saying inaudible things in the background etc. They're criminal operations passing data, not government ops, and you know? It's safer than putting that data over wires. That's why they're Baaaack! Rr
