-- At 02:34 PM 10/15/2000 -0700, Nathan Saper wrote: > > > IMHO, the NSA has enough expertise and technology to crack just > > > about any cipher out there. James A. Donald: > > No it does not. > > > > The expertise of the NSA, great though it is, is small compared to > > the expertise outside the NSA. At 10:26 PM 10/15/2000 -0700, Nathan Saper wrote: > Assuming we can evaluate accurately the magnitude of what goes on > inside the NSA... I know vastly more about cryptography than you do, and people who know vastly more about cryptography than I are confident that codes that pass lengthy peer review by themselves and people as good as they are, are unlikely to be broken by the NSA. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG ZlLhlzxncCnQOkHB8te81wDKtqWhcCTT3ldo+CKM 4lKVCVGVGO8ePP0CTWjDpfM+MInzJaH477ddm+DDY
- Re: why should it be trusted? Marshall Clow
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: why should it be trusted? David Honig
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? James A.. Donald
- Re: why should it be trusted? Sampo A Syreeni
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Joshua R. Poulson
- Re: why should it be trusted? David Honig
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Declan McCullagh
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper