On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote: > >You're thinking too literally. Show of force: When an employer reminds >a slacker that having a job is not a right. That's just shit rolling downhill. How long is a manager going to have his job if he *doesn't* fire slackers? Or how long can an employer continue to make a profit and thus remain in business if they never clear "dead-weight" employees out of the company? Reminding a slacker of this fact is merely a reality check. Now, if it were an attractive member of the appropriate sex who was refusing to have sex with the employer, *that* would be a pure show of force... Bear
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft Anonymous
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft sparky
- Re: CDR: Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft Harmon Seaver
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft Greg Broiles
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcr... Jim Burnes
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcr... Jim Burnes
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... James A. Donald
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Ray Dillinger
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... James A. Donald
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... petro
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Tim May
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Mac Norton
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... John Young
- Re: CDR: Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcr... Bill Stewart
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft Declan McCullagh