On 10/09/2016 08:50 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: >> >> What X mentioned: "law banning distribution of "propaganda >> of non-traditional sexual relationships" to minors." isn't. > > Oh? Care to explain or should we just take your word for it? Because it > seems to me that a law that makes a DISCRIMINATION between one type of > material and another is, obviously, discriminatory. If it outlaws > distributing ANY type of sexual-oriented propaganda to minors, I would > agree with you.
Better start looking through Russian laws about 'sexual-oriented propaganda'. Because, just off the top of my head, for a start, material suggesting young people visit prostitutes of the opposite gender is illegal. But I KNOW you're evading my point because that's what you do. That's ALL you do. Rr > > But the law is written, and intended, so that heterosexual propaganda can > be distributed to homosexual kids. > > It's discrimination. > >> Thanks for making my point X. > > Actually, my point was that you were wrong in your assertion that things > were A-OK for homosexuals in Russia since 1917. That is what you claimed. > > You completely ignored my point about Stalin in '33. > > So, no I didn't make your point at all. >